Wednesday, 6 December 2017

Earliest Farnborough Kent parish registers

The earliest entries for the parish of Farnborough are in fact found in the mother Church of Saint Martin of Tours at Chelsfield. This church which was separated from the village in the twentieth century served a very large area and Farnborough was originally a chapel of ease with a rector of both places.
It is wonderful to reflect on over 900 years of Christian Worship at Saint Martin's and although unusual for such old records to remain in the parish rather than be deposited at the designated Diocesan Archve I was able to visit the vestry to examine the record. I will return to comment on the record and transcript shortly but wanted to comment on Chelsfield parish church which is an open church such a rarity in these days. It is a place of peace quiet and spirituality which also serves many age groups in the village.
There is an unusual survival in the north wall of the church a squint window which was probably a Hagioscope or leper squint to enable a seated view of the elevation of the host at eucharist.  The parish register for Chelsfield and neighbouring parishes (including Farnborough) record various diseases as fatal to groups of residents from the early years of the 16th century onwards and since the church was mentioned in the Textus Roffensis in 1122 A.D. it does seem that the squint window was built into the north wall from an early age.
Chelsfield also contains and celebrates Brass Crosby who in 1771 as Chief magistrate released a prisoner who dared to publish parliamentary proceedings and was subsequently imprisioned in the Tower of London himself. He was released and subsequently Hansard was published as a daily record of Parliamentary proceedings. Brass married the Church and a memorial to him is on the north wall of the Church.
To return to the record for Farnborough bound in the volume of Chelsfield, let me first say that the record has used a vellum deed as an external cover and been bound to the deed. I did not attempt to read the deed as it is awkward to do so but the last Farnborough entries are on a fold of the deed inside what is the rear cover of the bound pages. Since the early Downe parish register was also bound in similar fashion it is an interesting coincidence particularly as in Downe we have an entry which records roughly the month and year of this treatment.
There are signs of pages affected by dampness and with water stains and handling of some page edges has resulted in their loss but in most surviving years it is possible to offer a transcript. Some names and dates have been lost. For those searching for Farnborough records prior to 1558 the earliest entry in the Farnborough Composite Register deposited at Bromley Historic Collections reference P/144/1/1 and searching for the missing years in that register this transcript will provide some answers.
1538 saw the introduction of the parish register and at first King Henry VIII's measure was feared as a means of taxation. The retention of the register at Chelsfield reflects the old parish church and Rector and status of Farnborough as a chapel of ease. The creation of a Farnborough register in 1558 which remained in that church reflecting "the parishe Churche of Farnborowe". In 1552 The Kings inspectors visited Farnborough and declared it to be free of "Popish" items and had not disposed illegally of any items effectively giving the parish and Churchwardens John Lambe and George Marshall a clean bill of health. The required three yearly inspection has been carried out to the present day although it is the duty of the local Rural Dean to inspect these days.
Farnborough was a combined benefice with Chelsfield and the Rector usually resided in Chelsfield. A curate was responsible for Farnborough. On the death of the third rector from the family of George Smiths to serve as rector during the Commonwealth period (1640-1660) Parliament installed John Montague as rector of Farnborough and Robert Miller at Chelsfield. In 1660 Robert Miller became Rector of the Joint Benefice resuming it's relation with its patron. In 1751  All Souls College Oxford became patron of the joint benefice The retention of a record at Chelsfield enables many years of usual gap in parish records to be covered although to what extent this constitues a complete record we will never know.
My transcript is being prepared for online publication at the Kent Online Parish Clerks Farnborough page in due course.
© Henry Mantell Downe Online Parish Clerk 2013-2018

Thursday, 2 November 2017

Farnborough Kent Composite Register 1749-1812

My email correspondents have recently queried why their Downe ancestor was not buried in the churchyard at Downe;invariably my answer has included burials in nearby parishes and recent answers were found in the Churchyard at Farnborough.
This lead me to the Composite Register which broadly covers the years from 1752-1912. The register is not capable of being digitally scanned and evaded the Genealogical Society of Utah filming at Bromley in the 1970's. It is preserved in two paper conservators ring bound volumes which contain the fragmentary pages in protective covers which are sealed and stitched.

The history of this volume has been pieced together from various sources. In the late 1890's to 1903 it was handled in the parish by antiquarian Henry Wilson who lived at Farnborough Lodge. In 1903 he completed a foreword for a book entitled the Parish Registers of Farnborough which was printed and published in 1904 and which he is designated as editor. Henry Wilson died in 1908 and a large gravestone remains in the churchyard of  Farnborough Saint Giles the Abbot.
Henry describes the volume he handled as " 168 pages of parchment 12 and three quarter inches by 7 inches and bound in rough calf. It has marriages from 1752 to 1791 and at the other end marriages from 1792 to 1800. It also includes christenings from 1749 to 1812 and burials from 1792 to 1800."
Between 1903 and its arrival in 1974 at Bromley Archive the designated Diocesan Record Office for Bromley Borough Anglican parishes the volume was subject to fire and water damage. It was handed to the Maidstone Record Office when it left the parish and returned in 1978 for recovery and conservation. Although I have searched for any record of a fire at the Church and made enquiries of Farnborough residents; when and where this volume was damaged eludes me. The Kent Record Office at Maidstone included a paper conservater who took all steps to conserve the pages. The cover of the volume did not survive and conservation decisions omit any blank pages. The sequence of the entries in the original format has not been maintained so searches are complicated. Henry Wilson's transcript published in 1904 follows the entry sequence of the original and describes intervening mariage entries in both Baptism and Burial page sequences. As the burials were located largely at the end of the volume they are particularly affected by fire damage. Burial entries from 1801 to 1812 survive and I have been able to locate and transcribe them all but heat and water have curled both sides of the pages which means dates are complicated due to curling and shrinkage. The conservation treatment has also resulted in sorting pages in a sequence which is anything but chronological and Henry Wilson's page descriptions are useful in showing the undamaged volume sequence. There are gaps in  the recording of the original register for the burial sequence and therefore some years are missing.
I have found Henry Wilson's transcript to have one or two surname errors and date errors but these are less than 1%  of the total.
The sequence of christening entries owes its inconsistency to the original record keeping and is further complicated by treatment by the conservation. The condition of pages for the baptismal sequences in both of the two surviving conservation volumes are better than those for burials and with only a handful of entries is there any difficulty. Although difficult to search for an individual these pages will benefit from computer handling to sort the data into alphabetical order for publication on the Kent Online Parish Clerks Farnborough parish page in due course.
Henry Wilson also encountered a gap between 1624 and 1660 for entries and found at  the mother parish of Chelsfield that Farnborough entries omitted from the earliest Composite register for the parish. The Chelsfield content includes marriages from 1538 to 1557 and many entries which largely fill the gap from 1624-1660 although entiries are incomplete in the later years of this period.
Despite the helpfulness of the Henry Wilson register the original publication is only available in photocopy form at the Society of Genealogists and the Bromley Hisorical Collections photocopy of the Society's photocopy suffers from the method of photcopying a bound volume.
It is hoped that work on the surviving record will enable online searchers to locate entries which are time consuming to locate in the original. Searching the volume for a single entry can take up to one hour research time so that an easy search for surnames will benefit many people who do not have access to Bromley Historical Collections.
I have found the challenge of the transcription rewarding. The inclusion of detail of cause of death after 1800 quite moving in several cases. I am once again reminded of the frequency of death by waggons running over people or ponds being site of drowning or suicide.
The Baptisms were originally added at head or foot of pages otherwise filled by marriage entries with witness signatures. There are several severely damaged pages which refer to marriages which are now virtually lost;however Henry Wilson could clearly read the entries and this helps overcome some problems. The Marriage entries are chaotically placed out of chronological sequence as Wilson found before the record was damaged. Baptismal entries on marriage pages are many years different from the dates of marriages and there is one whole page recording the  Whiffen children a large family with wide date range.
I'm grateful to Bromley Historic Collections for access to these two conservation folders which are close to being unable to be handled and have a sense that few people have handled them since 1974-1978 when they came to Bromley. The register serves as a reminder how close we can come to losing records vital to family historians for significant periods of history.

© Henry Mantell Downe Online Parish Clerk 2013-2017

Sunday, 22 October 2017

Lieutenant Geoffrey Saxton White VC

Occasionally in my emails I receive thanks for some transcript entries made in recent years and published online at Kent Online Parish Clerks.
Recently enquiries were made and research undertaken in order to establish a memorial plaque to Lieutenant White as Victoria Cross recipient who was born in Bromley on 2 July 1886.
He was baptised at Saint Peter and Saint Paul Bromley Parish Church on 23 October 1886 son of William Henry White whose occupation is recorded as a Civil Servant and his wife Alice. The Baptismal entry in the transcript at Kent Online Parish Clerks website provided the crucial identification of the the family home needed to locate a commemorative plaque for a Victoria Cross recipient.
Although he is commemorated on Panel 28 Column 3 of the Portsmouth Naval Memorial in Hampshire since he has no known grave the recognition of his Bromley birth will be significant.
His family did not reside long in Bromley and Geoffrey entered naval service on 15 May 1901 and was found to be a promising naval Cadet advancing to Midshipman in December 1903 Assistant Sub- Lieutenant in February 1906 and Sub-Lieutenant on 15 February 1906. He became a Lieutenant on 1 October 1908 and on 1 May 1909 went to Forth for Submarine training. His service record comments on his abilities and "zeal and very good way of working the ship's company who work well under him".
In 1915 and 1916 he was based at Maidstone and attained the rank of Lieutenant Commander on 1 October 1916. His service record also records that he was married on 26 June 1911.

On 28 January 1918 when in command of  HM Submarine E 14 in the Dardanelles,he was ordered to locate the German battle cruiser "Goeber" reported aground. Unable to locate her,he came across another enemy ship which he torpedoed but detonation of the torpedo damaged E14 forcing her to surface. The submarine was damaged by shellfire and he decided to ground the submarine to give his crew chance of safety. He himself remained on deck until killed by a shell.
The London Gazette of 23 May 1919 contains the Admiralty record of the posthumous award of the Victoria Cross. An image of him can be found on the Memorials to valour web page.
The torpedo fired from E14 detonated 11 seconds after it left the submarine's tube and burst open the forehatch of the submarine. Initial shelling from forts on both sides failed to damage the submarine and E14 then dived and sought a way out but "the boat became out of control,and as the air supply was limited was nearly exhausted,Leutenant Commander White decided to run the risk of proceeding on the surface. Heavy fire was immediately opened from both sides,and after running the gauntlet for over half-an-hour,being steered from below,E14 was so badly damaged that Lietanant Commander White turned towards shore in order to give the crew a chance of being saved. He remained on deck the whole time himself until he was killed by a shell."
E14 was a unique submarine in naval history as two Victoria Crosses were awarded to her crew;images of her and details of her wreck location are found  in the Daily Telegraph article.
Lieutenant Commander White was killed om 28 January 1918 age 31.
I look forward to the Bromley commemoration of his gallantry and it seem fitting today to remember his Bromley baptismal anniversary.
© Henry Mantell Downe Online Parish Clerk 2013-2017

Thursday, 19 October 2017

Cudham Kent Baptisms and Burials Composite register 1763-1800

Over the years as Downe Online Parish Clerk I have had regular contact from frustrated searchers trying to locate entries in Cudham the adjacent parish to Downe. I soon encountered the anarchy of the preserved record prior to 1800.
I have spent a good deal of time examining the Composite Register volume for the years 1763-1800 to prepare a transcript which will be simple to search. Along the way I have encountered some woeful record keeping.
My transcript of the Banns and Marriages register at Kent Online Parish Clerks is already available online and hints at the problems facing the searcher. It also demonstrates the simple search enabled by the transcriber.
Since the Reverend Thomas Browne Curate at Cudham created anarchy in the marriage register with up to three attempts at spelling a surname and frequent errors (often concealed by an inkblot smear) it was not a surise to discover that the Composite register of baptisms and burials was a challenge.
The granting of permission to microfilm this volume only narrowly given by the Parochial Church Council and lead to Genealogical Society of Utah microfilming. In this volume the collection of images is incomplete (as in another volume of burials). Many of my correspondents had experienced grave difficulty with microfilm as a search method. Before the volume was handled by microfilming operator Bromley Archive had numbered in pencil each sheet in the bound volume. I believe that the string bound volume with loose sheets may have been bound circa 1880. On archive page 5 following two blank sheets the register directory reads:
"The entries begin at this side in 1763 and are written on right hand pages to the middle of the book and there end in 1783. The entries begin at the other side on page 14 and writing on both sides but in some interleaved with burials and end in 1800".
I have been unable to establish where the "page 14" is in the surviving record and this Directory omits to mention the two marriage entries found in the volume. One of these is entered in the Marriage register and included in my transcript but when you reach the rear of the bound sheets and turn the volume over to continue to search for Baptisms a single sheet contains a marriage entry with spouses signatures and four witness signatures. Within the archive numbered page 103 are the following marriage entry and two added private baptisms at Cudham Lodge in 1788 and 1790 of STRINGER children.
On 22 October 1788 the marriage of John MONK and Mary TILDEN both of Cudham parish was conducted by Curate Robert Fegan;both spouses sign the single sheet and the marriage was conducted by licence so no entry is found in the banns book. The four witnesses are Thomas TILDEN Elizabeth HILL Alice MONK  and Ann JEWSON.
It appears to me in examing the whole record that the random mixture of a marriage and private baptisms on a single sheet reflects the casual approach to the record which is predominantly the work of Thomas Browne whose longevity as a rural curate does not indicate stellar performance as part of his career in the parish. The record includes entries omitted by him (mentioned by name) presumably to reflect to the compiler of the Bishop's Transcript who was at fault. It is also clear that he was responsible for many surname variant spellings and errors perhaps reflecting poor penmanship. The supply of quills and the poor quality ink used in Cudham poses an additional problem as several entries are so faint as to be barely legible although the sheets have not needed paper conservation in their decades in archival conservation. I included a warning about his Marriage register entries which have been found to err greatly as to surname spellings and this volume also reflects this problem.
The burial entries indicate that the Curate was responsible for the parish Workhouse inmates at Leaves Green and private baptisms at Aperfield Cudham Lodge and the farms at the extremities of the seven mile long parish. The Workhouse burials occur in the 1780's and this appears to date the opening of the parish workhouse It is clear that the record was not immediately entered as entires for different years appear and the sheets are not in chronological sequence in the binding. The two hands for some years and separation of entires suggest that vicar and curate kept separate sheets.
I would caution any searcher for family that the surviving and conserved record may therefore be incomplete and inaccurate for names and dates because there are entries which revert to use of the Gregorian calendar month which seem implausible within content on an individual page.
I hope that the many hours spent sifting this record will emulate the Banns and Marriage transcript in simple search when the final preparation of data for online parish publication by Kent Online Parish Clerks and that searchers will have a simpler experience.
In responding to correspondence an average look up in this record has taken up to an hour to locate an entry when a year of birth was known.
© Henry Mantell Downe Online Parish Clerk 2013-2017

Saturday, 24 December 2016

Christmas Day in the Bromley Union Workhouse

"And it was always said of him that he knew how to keep Christmas well if any man alive possessed the knowledge. May that truly be said of us,and all of us." -Charles Dickens A Christmas Carol.

Any consideration of Christmas Day in the Workhouse of Bromley Union must consider the example of Charles William Gedney a Union Guardian.
In 1927 he died pacefully in his sleep in early January shortly after he had organised his 57th year of Christmas Day celebrations for the inmates of the Workhouse.
This year round activity involved securing donations from the public of the parishes of The Union to make the hundreds of men women and children unfortunate enough to be inmates at Christmas feel something of Christmas.
The staff of the Workhouse and their families were also recruited to the cause and donations of decorations and large amounts of evergreens from various estates in the district were put to use to decorate the chapel, wards of the Infirmary and day rooms throughout the site. The dining hall was heavily decorated throughout the beamed ceiling.
Gedney ensured toys for each child which he distributed whilst the men would be offered very acceptable tobacco and the women packets of sugar and tea.
Most Workhouses received such gifts but Bromley is exceptional in that one Guardian took responsibility for so many decades. His sons had grown up spending their Christmas Day as a family giving their time to those in need and in support of their father's work.
Christmas Dinner was nearly always reported in local newspapers and consisted of roast beef and roast pork, mutton and plum pudding. Alcohol was not provided but Mister Gedney always secured mineral water donated by a local company.
In the evening musical and other entertainments were organised with visitor musicians and singers to entertain.
Mister Gedney usually received a traditional vote of thanks from The Master of the Workhouse and would make a short speech of thanks. Occasionally in some years he prevailed upon the Chair of the Board of Guardians to appear.
In 1908 he was able to make a speech and appreciate the introduction of old age pensions. Initially the pension of five shillings a week from 1 January 1909 was not available to those in receipt of poor law relief. Mister Gedney suggested that were 5 shillings a week available to relatives many elderly residents of the Workhouse over 70 years of age would find home with family members.(From 1 January 1911 those over 70 years of age in receipt of Poor Law Relief  were adopted into the scheme and Act of 1908).
Bromley Union had prior to this had a larger than average number of inmates over 70 and had a reputation of an enlarged Infirmary and improved accommodation for children from 1909. Gedney's prediction proved accurate as the number of people over 70 fell throughout the remainder of his years as a Guardian.
© Henry Mantell Downe Online Parish Clerk 2013-2017

Charles William Gedney Part II Poor Law Guardian

Gedney was as I described in part I of this blog a pungent and outspoken critic of the decision by Bromley Union's Poor Law Guardians to exclude journalists from Board meetings held at the Union Workhouse. This coupled with criticism of the diet offered to inmates which had featured prominently in a General Election  lead Gedney to submit his name for election as a Guardian. His first efforts were unsuccessful but as he developed criticism of the way children were housed with adults in the Workhouse and the Guardians lack of response to Local Government initiatives to board such children out in foster homes over a 15 year period he was duly elected by Bromley Parish as a Guardian.
From the outset this forward thinking amiable man was to devote his service to the lot of destitute women and children in particular.
He was outraged by the Workhouse education of children and argued for attendance at local Board schools; later when the Farnborough School Board expanded the school the Board were to offer places at the school for children from the nearby Workhouse on condition that they did not "wear Workhouse habit" to school.
His concern for education generally lead to his election to the Bromley School Board and he and Miss Hepple were the only two members to remain until Bromley became a Council and an Education Committee assumed responsibilty. The popularity of these two members enabled their re-election all other original members were ejected due to delay in securing land for much needed schools championed by both successful candidates.
In 1885 he succeeded in establishing a Boarding Out Committee  for "deserted and and orphaned children" and as the Boarding Out Committe minutes record he successfully placed 36 children in "cottage homes" and local Board Schools in that year. Later he was to dramaticllay increase the number of eligible children to enter foster homes.
From the outset he placed heavy emphasis on after care and particular emphasis on training girls and guardianship of these young women some time after they ceased to "on the books" of the Guardians. In the 1920's obituarists were to comment on his willingness to accommodate in his own home those whose service had ended through no fault of their own.
Throughout the two volumes of Boarding Out Committe minutes there are examples of his intervention in case of sudden critical illness to transport a child to London for treatment and report to Committee the outcome of his intervention. he was also available to assit in removal of children from unsuitable foster parents.
The 1887 movement in Bromley to recruit and elect women Guardians was supported as he felt that the success of Boarding Out Children should increase and in other unions Ladies Boarding Out Committees were succeeding. In 1890 Bromley Union had Isabella Frances Akers elected. After her first remarks to the Guardians Gedney was somewhat ruffled by criticism of the conditions for women and children but characteristically his criticism of her remarks and her apology if she had offended Board members was met with amiable support. Indeed as Miss Akers introduced reforms to the Union she was fully supported and soon more parishes elected Women guardians in some cases unopposed. After the tragic death of Miss Akers her work was continued by a  highly effective group of women guardians and fostering in the rapid expansion of Bromley Union's population was well organised to support those leaving foster care.
The 14 year old Charles William Gedney's naval career and injury in active service overseas was perhaps the influence that ensured that Naval Training ships and Army recruitment was pursued by the Union's children and also provided funding for accommodation for young female servants out of situations by supporting the Bromley Servants House. The injured naval midshipman had come home to take up a new career and he pursued every opportunity for young men and women to emigrate to Canada through numerous Emigration Socities and ensured that the Guardians had Emigration Committee and funding to assist where necessary.
It is difficult to write about Bromley Poor Law Union Workhouse in the last quarter of the nineteenth century and first quarter of the twentieth century without appreciating his great contribution.
He was a mover in developing the Union Workhouse accommodation in general but especially separate housing for Boys and Girls in houses along Wellbrook Road,removing children entirely from the adult accommodation. He also proposed improved Infirmary accommodation in added wings and eventual improvement to casuals accommodation and saniation for women. He was pragmatic enough to point out the unsuitability of requiring casuals to perform "the stone test" a fitness to work test by breaking stone as the 1830's Workhouse housed casuals in cells unlike other Workhouses.
Nowadays we grumble about snowfall inconveniencing travel; but in the Victorian era frost and snow in the first three months of each year stopped farm workers and those in the building industry from working and many local families became destitute. Gedney's concern to improve the Workhouse diet had lead to a Workhouse Bakery (and incidentally apprenticeships for those boarded out). It became possible for the bakery to not only feed inmates but to offer relief in seasonal hardship. The Relieving Officers worked closely with the local government to open up labour yards at Beckenham and Waldo Road Bromley and Gedney would on these occasions visit the men during their lunch break.
When proposals to reform Workhouses were tabled Gedney referred to Locksbottom as being a House for the elderly and sick and was able to demonstrate this by numbers of able bodied poor being lower than comparable Unions whilst the Infirmary was larger.
It was also his activity alone to organise local efforts year round to support the annual "Workhouse Holiday" each August or September from 1880 onwards. Through the generosity of local landowners and businesses offering transport all inmates of the Workhouse would be taken for a day for lunch and tea. Sir John Lubbock became the regular host at High Elms of 200-300 men women and children and many Bromley businesses which maintained vehicles would transport them there. Mister Gedney would always speak and offer a vote of thanks to the host and year round would ensure that tableware seating .
As we will see in another blog Christmas Day in the Workhouse at Locksbottom became inseperable from the Gedney family.
Charles William Gedney died on 7 January 1927 peacefully in his sleep days after organising his 57th annual Christmas Day for the Workhouse which he always referred to as the "grim grey Great House" but the Workhouse was a much more effective organisation for his long service and zealous efforts to improve the lives of those who were admitted.
© Henry Mantell Downe Online Parish Clerk 2013-2017

Charles William Gedney:Part I Journalist and Author

Charles William Gedney was born at Aldwick Sussex and educated a private school. At the age of 14 he became a naval cadet and served with distinction as a Midshipman under the captaincy of Captain William Peel V C aboard HMS Shannon 1855 when he formed part of the  naval brigade at the relief of Lucknow dragging guns overland to defend and fortify the garrison under siege.
He also sailed up the Yangtze River in 1857 when he was one of 46 injured sailors in the Battle of Canton (1857). This injury ended his career at sea and he returned home to take up journalism working for two years as journalist on the Daily News.
In 1865 he arrived in Bromley and began to publish the "The Bromley Telegraph" printed at 25 Market Square, a house at the south east corner of Market Square which Horsbrugh describes as:
"a secluded house with an ample forecourt containing lime trees and enclosed by wooden railings". It had in the 1801 census of Bromley been home to Edward Broad and subsequently occupied by Miss Anne Broad "a very select dressmaker,many of the county families from the surrounding neighbourhood being her patrons."
Gedney had a printing office on the ground floor which is sometimes referred to as "Telegraph" Printing Works Bromley.
Gedney became famous for his "highly seasoned" local reading which under his pseudonym "Idler in Local Gossip" criticised the way that local affairs were organised. This pungent outspoken critical attitude to authority's was to lead him to defend 20 actions against him in the High Court. He later joked that he lost only two which " I should have won and won one which I should have lost".
Despite this reputation locally described by Horsbrugh on his arrival in 1881 in Bromley as "a dangerous iconoclast and doubtless would have been dubbed a Bolshevist had that appellation existed" Horsbrugh became a personal friend and  described  a kind and jovial disposition encouraging others to enter journalism. He was somewhat ahead of his time in that those in public positions were unaccustomed to criticism.
He was a snooker player at The Liberal Club in Bromley and a supporter of Liberal politics in the town.
He was angered by the Local Board of Guardians refusal to admit journalists to meetings at the Workhouse and was also dissatisfied by the diet of inmates at what he referred to as The "grim and grey Great House".
In Part II I will pursue his action against the manner in which the Workhouse was being run.
In 1896 Gedney printed and published
This publication was successful and shows Gedney at leisure as a Fly Fisherman travelling to Ireland Scotland and Wales by train to enjoy his sport. The book is still read in various formats available online.
For many years he wrote the "Circular Notes "column in Illustrated Sporting and Dramatic News.
In 1902 he sold his printing business to the proprietors of the Bromley Chronicle and for ten years from 1902-1912 the BromleyTelegraph and Chronicle was published.
After retirement he cared for his wife Annie during a lengthy illness until her death at their Glebe Road home on 17 October 1906. She was buried at the London Road Cemetery on 22 October 1906 when Charles was accompanied by his three sons at the funeral described by The Bromley Record obituary.
As we will see in Part II his kind and jovial disposition was to bless many lives throughout his long years of public service.
© Henry Mantell Downe Online Parish Clerk 2013-2017